On October 16, 2018, an advocate named Mr. Avnish Verma filed a complaint against the SBI Chairperson, SBI Nodal Officer, and Branch Manager of the SBI Krishna Nagar Branch in Kanpur Nagar. Mr. Verma was eligible to take the UP Public Service Commission's (UPPSC) 2015 Assistant Prosecution Officer (A.P.O.) preliminary test. He deposited the necessary ₹225 at SBI Krishna Nagar in order to take the main exam.
Nevertheless, the fee was not deposited into the UPPSC account by the bank clerk. Rather, a general receipt (No. 41514396) that was invalid for the examination procedure was issued by the clerk. Mr. Verma claimed that the bank employee's negligent, irresponsible, and malevolent actions were to blame for this.
The candidate had to amend the fee information on the UPPSC website in accordance with the exam regulations. Two days after paying the charge, Mr. Verma attempted to update the data, but the attempt was unsuccessful. The bank only told him that there was a "technical issue" and requested that he try again at a later time. The update failed once more on December 11, 2015.
Unfortunately December 12, 2015 was Second Saturday (bank holiday) and December 13, 2015 was Sunday (UPPSC deadline). Because of this, he could not complete the process and ultimately missed the opportunity to appear in the A.P.O. 2015 Main Exam. Mr. Verma stated that this mistake caused serious damage to his career prospects, along with mental and financial loss.
Complaint lodged in RBI Ombudsman
The complainant submitted a complaint to the RBI's Banking Ombudsman on December 11, 2015. On April 8, 2016, the SBI Branch Manager responded by acknowledging the error in a letter of apologies. Mr. Verma refused to accept the Banking Ombudsman's subsequent ruling for SBI to pay ₹10,000 in compensation.
He then filed a claim for ₹20,000,000 in compensation with the Consumer Commission. Despite receiving notices, SBI representatives failed to show up before the Commission. Consequently, on May 14, 2019, the Commission moved forward ex-parte. SBI did not pay the ₹300 fee imposed by the Commission, despite later filing a recall application. As a result, on November 17, 2022, their written statement was ruled inadmissible, and they were prohibited from testifying.
The complainant, however, submitted strong documentary proof, including Fee deposit receipt, UPPSC notifications, Complaint to Banking Ombudsman, SBI apology letter, Marksheets and other documents showing past exam performance.
Commission’s Findings
The Commission held that:
* SBI clearly failed to deposit the fee.
* The mistake prevented the complainant from appearing in a major competitive exam.
* This caused irreparable loss to his career.
* The bank admitted its mistake through the apology letter.
* Even the Banking Ombudsman had found SBI at fault.
Final Order of the Commission
The Commission partially allowed the complaint and ordered SBI (all opposite parties jointly and severally) to:
* Pay ₹7,00,000 (Seven Lakh) as lump sum compensation For the complainant’s career loss and mental, physical, and financial suffering.
* Pay 7% simple annual interest From the date of filing the complaint (October 16, 2018) till actual payment.
* Pay ₹10,000 as litigation cost.
The bank must comply with the order within 45 days from the date of judgment.












